Money and self willed Shanghai first owner to his villa razed to the ground-xingbayounichunnuanhuakai

Home / Money and self willed Shanghai first owner to his villa razed to the ground-xingbayounichunnuanhuakai

Rich: Shanghai a wayward owners have put their house razed to the ground [Abstract]: the property can not control district construction management committee in the decoration: not received reconstruction application, unless the professional identification can be dangerous redevelopment 88 villas have been razed to the ground, around the site scaffolding, pull the black sand, a large excavator is still in construction. Morning news reporter Zhang Jiaqi morning news reporter Li Donghua Yu Lili intern Zhao Zhen Hui industry district of Qingpu road 86 get China Sea Jade Lake Villa four, close to 318 National Road and Shanghai Green Ping highway, near the Sheshan scenic area and outlet area of the business district, each villa comes with hundreds of square meters garden, the market price of more than 10 million yuan. Since October, four No. 88 owners "domineering decoration" caused the neighbors puzzled and worried: construction workers directly drove a large excavator, stately into the District, to the 2 storey villa razed to the ground; the house demolition triggered shock had toppled the neighbor in the vase on the table. "Such a large demolition, reconstruction and expansion should be in the future!" Small owners worry, so large demolition will affect other owners of the housing security? Don’t think villa can be split apart, want to build? The district planning board and the management committee had not received reconstruction application No. 88 owners to eradicate the entire villa, really like the other owners said is to rebuild? Morning news reporter tried to contact the owner surnamed Wei, has not been able to contact. According to a reluctance to disclose the names of the Qingpu District Urban Management Bureau staff, under normal circumstances, if the illegal construction occurred within the District, or the existence of illegal construction, reported by the people after the inspectors to the scene to verify, and law enforcement. But the staff said on the No. 88 villa demolition of lack of knowledge. But at the same time, if the other party to rebuild, must have approval, no approval is suspected of violating the law: "the other side is now demolished, not built, so it’s hard to say." Morning news reporter then contacted the Qingpu District Bureau of planning and construction management committee, the reply is not received, the application from the reconstruction of No. 88 owners. District Management Committee said a staff member, unless the house is dangerous, and needs to be accredited by a professional institution, it is possible to obtain approval for reconstruction, and the villa was built around 2007. A lawyer shall not endanger the safety of building view of Shanghai Haihua Yongtai law firm senior partner He Qiang lawyer said, according to the "property law" provisions of article seventy-first, the owners enjoy possession, use, income and disposition rights of the exclusive parts of the building, but it does not mean that the right to unrestricted wanton exercise. This provision also stipulates: "the owners shall not endanger the safety of the building to exercise their rights, shall not prejudice the legitimate interests of other owners." He Qiang said that the villa built at the beginning, is built according to the relevant planning approval, any damage to building safety behavior, should be regarded as illegal. For the 88 owners dismantling the entire villa, He Qiang believes that the residential property owners or property companies, and even the adjacent property owners based on neighboring rights, all have the duty and the right to report to the relevant departments or to the courts, in strict accordance with the original plan for the owners, they resumed, and the corresponding punishment. Owner: Excavator into residential demolition according to insiders, No. 88"

有钱任性:沪一业主竟将自家别墅夷为了平地 [摘要]物业:是在装修没法管 区建管委:未收到重建申请,除非专业认定危房才可重建审批88号别墅已被夷为平地,工地四周搭起脚手架,拉起黑色沙网,大型挖掘机仍在施工。 晨报记者张佳琪 晨报记者李东华实习生于丽丽青浦区赵巷镇业辉路86弄的中海翡翠湖岸别墅四期,紧邻318国道和沪青平高速公路,靠近佘山风景区及奥特莱斯商业区,小区内每幢独栋别墅都自带上百平方米花园,市场价逾千万元。10月至今,四期88号一户业主的“霸气装修”引发了邻居们的不解与担忧:施工工人直接开着大型挖掘机,堂而皇之驶入小区,把这栋2层高的别墅夷为平地;拆房子引发的震动,一度震翻了隔壁邻居家桌上的花瓶。“如此大拆,应该是为了以后重建、扩建!”小区业主们担忧,如此大拆大建是否会对其他业主的房屋安全造成影响?难道别墅可以想拆就拆,想建就建?区规划局及建管委未接到过重建申请88号业主擅自铲除整栋别墅的行为,是否真像其他业主所说是要重建?晨报记者多方尝试联系魏姓业主,始终没能联系上。据青浦区城管局一名不愿透露姓名的工作人员介绍,正常情况下,如果小区内发生违法施工,或存在违建情况,经人举报后,城管都会到现场核实,并进行执法。但该工作人员称对88号拆除别墅一事不知情。但同时称,如果对方要重建,肯定要有批文,没有批文就涉嫌违法:“对方现在只是拆,还没建,所以很难定论。”晨报记者随后又联系了青浦区规划局及建管委,得到的回复是,从没有接到过88号业主的重建申请。区建管委一位工作人员表示,房子除非是危房,且需经过专业机构认定,才有可能进行审批获得重建,而这些别墅是2007年前后才建的。律师观点不得危及建筑安全上海海华永泰律师事务所高级合伙人贺强律师表示,根据《物权法》第71条规定,业主对其建筑物专有部分享有占有、使用、收益、处分的权利,但并不意味着权利可以不受限制地肆意行使。该条款同时规定:“业主行使权利不得危及建筑物的安全,不得损害其他业主的合法权益。”贺强说,别墅在修建之初,都是按相关的审批规划建造的,任何破坏建筑安全的行为,都应被视作违法。对于88号业主擅自拆除整栋别墅的行为,贺强认为,小区业主委员会或物业公司,甚至相邻业主基于相邻权,都有义务和权利向相关职能部门举报或向法院提起诉讼,要求业主严格按照当初规划,原样恢复,并进行相应处罚。业主:挖掘机进小区拆房据知情人透露,88号别墅的业主姓魏,于2013年1月份左右通过法院拍卖拿到了这套别墅,一直到今年,房子一天都没有住过,还是毛坯房。但10月7日,这里突然开始动工了。“一开始在别墅四周搭起脚手架,拉起黑色沙网,用彩钢板将别墅整个围了起来。当时,我们还以为是怕装修影响别人呢!”陈先生说,接下来几天,也没有什么大动静。但到了10月11日,风云突变。87号家的保姆说:“太吓人了,10点多我正在打扫卫生,突然听到砸墙声,声音特别大,感觉整幢房子都在晃,连放在桌上的一个花瓶都被震落在地摔碎了。”保姆跑到院子一看,一台大型挖掘机正在拆除隔壁的房子。据87号业主周女士介绍,她赶回家时,88号已被拆了半边楼,虽然有彩钢板隔着,但依然尘土漫天。她当即联系了小区物业经理,“他说并不清楚有业主使用大型挖掘机拆房,称这是隐瞒施工,有安全隐患,会找业主谈,叫停施工”。10月12日,88号的施工停止了。但仅仅停了一天,又复工了。“据说好几辆运土车都开进来了,几乎一分钟都没停过。”当晚,周女士下班回到家时,发现88号好好的一栋别墅已经被夷为平地。随后,她找到了小区保安主管,“他说对方是在装修,没办法阻止他们。物业经理也转变了口风,说没有执法权,拦不住,只能向相关政府部门上报。城管也来过,但是对方不是违建,他想拆自己家的房子,没办法管”。在采访中,多名小区业主猜测,88号拆除别墅,应该是为了重建、扩建。一名周姓业主给记者算了一笔账:原有的别墅,建筑与围栏间还有约3米的距离,除去大门靠近路边的不能扩,其它3面都按1米扩建的话,一层的面积就能多出60个平方米,两层带地下室就能多出180个平方米。”难道业主真的想拆就拆,想建就建,不需要任何审批?带着疑问,许多业主向区城管及建管委等相关部门进行反映,但无一职能部门介入。据多名业主证实,之后的20多天,该别墅一直处于施工状态,每天早上8点开工,下午5点结束。期间,建筑废料一车车向外运,而这栋别墅的业主从别墅拆除开始,自始至终都没有露过面。工人:地下室漏水要重修11月9日,晨报记者来到中海翡翠湖岸别墅四期,刚到小区门口,车辆就被门卫拦下,并被告知:除非得到小区内业主的邀请许可,否则其他车辆一律不得进入小区。在其他业主帮助下,晨报记者进入小区,发现88号四周仍搭着脚手架,东面用彩钢板搭起一面高约10米的临时墙,其他三面则用黑色纱网罩起,只有北面留了一个宽约3米的入口,供工人进出。走进工地,原来的两层别墅已被夷为平地,一辆大型挖掘机还在继续挖,地上已经挖出了一个深约3米的大坑。在约400平方米的空地上,除了工人搭建的一个临时活动板房外,现场一片狼藉,地面的草坪也被铲除,只剩下一堆堆的建筑垃圾和被拆除下来的钢筋。在表明记者身份后,记者询问了现场一名施工负责人。“这是要重建吗?”他说:“地下室漏水,要重修。”“漏水补漏不就行了,为什么要把整幢别墅都拆了?”他说:“我只是负责施工,其他事情不了解。”“施工多久了,有施工批文?”他说:“我不清楚。”在采访现场,记者遇到骑着电瓶车到此查看的保安主管胡先生。这样的施工是正常装修吗?这么大的挖掘机是怎么开进来的?面对上述问题,该保安主管没有正面回答,只是强调,“这件事我们管不了,已经上报给相关部门,我们是没有执法权的。”物业:违规,但管不了公开资料显示,中海翡翠湖岸别墅全部为独栋花园式建筑,多为2层,地上面积为220-380平方米,地下面积120-200平方米,此外还自带小花园,开发商是中海发展(上海)有限公司,物业则是中海物业公司。目前,该小区挂牌均价约为每平方米5万元,88号的建筑面积约为260平方米。一辆普通轿车进小区都会遭到严查,大型挖掘机又是如何开进小区的呢?为什么整幢别墅被拆除都没人阻止?带着这些疑问,记者来到小区二期寻找物业相关负责人,却在二期门口被门卫拦下。当记者表明来意后,保安通过对讲机向物业公司请示,得到的回复是,物业经理不在,没有负责人了,不能进小区,也不接受采访。随后晨报记者拿到了物业吴经理的手机号,并与其取得联系。记者:“下过整改通知吗?”吴经理:“通知肯定下过,但不能提供给你们。”记者:“挖掘机是你们放进去的?”吴经理:“人家要装修,装修车辆可以进。”记者:“物业都向哪些部门反映过此事了?”吴经理:“这个不能告诉你,这是内部事情。”相关的主题文章: